1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:26:16 +0100
|
5 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept |
8 |
> the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons |
9 |
> in a private mail. |
10 |
|
11 |
Interference goes both ways, that's why both of you are reverting; if
|
12 |
you mask the USE flag then you can keep the description, it is more
|
13 |
preferable than removing the flag from the ebuild (that is even stable).
|
14 |
|
15 |
> QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other |
16 |
> peoples ebuilds. (besides that you already managed to break the |
17 |
> Manifest of this stable package last time) |
18 |
|
19 |
QA is that it is written down (as a mask) that the USE flag is broken;
|
20 |
removing it just hides its brokenness, it might very well fit in your
|
21 |
workflow but if someone else joins maintenance or the package gets
|
22 |
maintained by someone else later "out of sight, out of mind" applies.
|
23 |
|
24 |
- --
|
25 |
With kind regards,
|
26 |
|
27 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
|
28 |
Gentoo Developer
|
29 |
|
30 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
|
31 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
|
32 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
|
33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
34 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
|
35 |
|
36 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSutLSAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9C3MIAKH8JzNIHpAXH8esAKe3EtQ5
|
37 |
HFJDHBPxjfBiAN2IB442rqjH3cfFHPI6EBb4ULb2TRIW2kgTyIGsUrmaPtONm9td
|
38 |
EYT+kAWlyh9OVRHlJ1jYoB2UTixBrdVaNApiMojJ9Uvn3yukSaDf7mW0rf9jxPv3
|
39 |
+92XjmuqTiPybC2qyp/nl6HNXoQ8TfQd+nLZiQm3AWXBR3hhiHDOUrMUlsdHmGFs
|
40 |
qlYMk529NFCGSFENBvooT3xSKUazXe+pjN06TycY9DKk2199dPWOeVYwIAlY1KqW
|
41 |
cuWyj/gqCMo7RSku+lkl/OKkn1NsIAvoA+IKBECjpdgD1/kPVdt6iBapDqh6RHI=
|
42 |
=E8a/
|
43 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |