| 1 |
Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 24 of March 2007 13:54:51 Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Ditto. Gentoo SoC projects need to be for Gentoo developed and sponsored |
| 4 |
>> code/projects, not third party projects, no matter how much they would |
| 5 |
>> whither and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of |
| 6 |
>> gentoo+gnome integration (i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be |
| 7 |
>> any more appropriate. Unless there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the |
| 8 |
>> header, it isn't eligible in my opinion. |
| 9 |
<..> |
| 10 |
> Google seems to concern more about the FOSS community than the |
| 11 |
> organizations' copyright in the header and imho that's a good thing. |
| 12 |
> Gentoo is supposed to be a _mentoring_ organization, so the only question |
| 13 |
> is whether Gentoo mentors are capable of mentoring a project or not. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Umm there clearly isn't any consensus on that last phrase. Other devs appear |
| 16 |
concerned about Gentoo copyright, which seems reasonable given the |
| 17 |
requirement to maintain the interests of the distro as a whole. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives