| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> Carsten Lohrke wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This is what I'd like to see clarified. To me, only a decision of the Council |
| 4 |
> > may lead to such a "suspension", as it is the relevant _elected_ entity. And |
| 5 |
> > I hereby request to add a paragraph at least, stating exactly this. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This is absurd. The council shouldn't need to make every decision in |
| 8 |
> Gentoo itself. It should be able to delegate power to any group it chooses. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Agreed, and they are allowed to revoke said power if they chose as well. |
| 11 |
This shouldn't happen, but if they believe a group has stepped out of |
| 12 |
line... Things should only go to the council when all other methods |
| 13 |
fail, and they are the only ones you can appeal to. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
| 17 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 18 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 19 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
| 20 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives