Archives
Archives
| From: | Michal Kurgan <moloh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) | ||
| Date: | Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:23:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080826202309.2e328a27@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:49:12 -0700 |
| 2 | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > The PROPERTIES approach still seems a lot simpler and practical to |
| 5 | > me. It seems to me that the approach involving categories introduces |
| 6 | > needless complexity without bringing any really useful benefits. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Could you elaborate on this categories complexity? I think that the idea is to |
| 9 | just use already available categories, not implementing additional PROPERTY |
| 10 | for this functionality. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Michal Kurgan |
| 14 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~moloh |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |