| 1 |
On Friday 11 July 2003 13:09, Alex Veber wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 11 July 2003 05:28, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Instead of virtual/wine, perhaps virtual/win32 would be better? After |
| 4 |
> > all, Gentoo Windows (aka Gentoo Cygwin) would probably use the actual |
| 5 |
> > Win32 libraries and not a WINE... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I honesly don't know anything about cygwin or how it works, but the main |
| 8 |
> reason of intreducing the wine virtual is so that apps can compile and link |
| 9 |
> against winelib. together with the wine-config tool I am working on will |
| 10 |
> enable users to link against diffrent versions of wine without a problem. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I agree, a virtual/win32 will probably not work. Most applications that want |
| 14 |
wine expect the wine environment. They don't expect actual windows. Of |
| 15 |
course, in case we have a win32 port the wine dependency can be made |
| 16 |
dependent on that (!win32? (virtual/wine) ) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Paul |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 22 |
Researcher |
| 23 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 24 |
Homepage: http://www.cs.kun.nl/~pauldv |
Archives