1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 13/01/14 09:39, C. Bergström wrote: |
5 |
> Drive-by trolling comment but I wish the effort to keep porkage |
6 |
> alive would have instead been directed towards pkgcore. |
7 |
Realistically, we have to keep updating them both in parallel. pkgcore |
8 |
needs to be brought up to portage-level functionality, and we need to |
9 |
keep fixing portage bugs for its many users. We could have a technical |
10 |
discussion on the merits of pkgcore vs. portage, but in the end, it's |
11 |
about the users. |
12 |
|
13 |
For the record, I would be very happy if you hacked on pkgcore. Just |
14 |
as happy as if you hacked on portage, even. So please do. :-) |
15 |
- -- |
16 |
Alexander |
17 |
alexander@××××××.net |
18 |
http://plaimi.net/~alexander |
19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
20 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
22 |
|
23 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlLTpx8ACgkQRtClrXBQc7UXtAEAp+ZlhX1E7NGp4rF0x8yEVzFk |
24 |
Ynf1W9rr0Q2XZ3nBsk4A/RsrKd82zgYPaBizcs2toz/U9pjmbOkS9PUQPJAFe4ze |
25 |
=EKI+ |
26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |