| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 13/01/14 09:39, C. Bergström wrote: |
| 5 |
> Drive-by trolling comment but I wish the effort to keep porkage |
| 6 |
> alive would have instead been directed towards pkgcore. |
| 7 |
Realistically, we have to keep updating them both in parallel. pkgcore |
| 8 |
needs to be brought up to portage-level functionality, and we need to |
| 9 |
keep fixing portage bugs for its many users. We could have a technical |
| 10 |
discussion on the merits of pkgcore vs. portage, but in the end, it's |
| 11 |
about the users. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
For the record, I would be very happy if you hacked on pkgcore. Just |
| 14 |
as happy as if you hacked on portage, even. So please do. :-) |
| 15 |
- -- |
| 16 |
Alexander |
| 17 |
alexander@××××××.net |
| 18 |
http://plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlLTpx8ACgkQRtClrXBQc7UXtAEAp+ZlhX1E7NGp4rF0x8yEVzFk |
| 24 |
Ynf1W9rr0Q2XZ3nBsk4A/RsrKd82zgYPaBizcs2toz/U9pjmbOkS9PUQPJAFe4ze |
| 25 |
=EKI+ |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives