1 |
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:02:02 +0200 |
2 |
Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:17:48 -0600 |
5 |
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > Should LICENSE changes require a revision bump? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> No. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Any ebuild should be published with a correct reference to a license. |
12 |
> If you initially publish the ebuild with a bad reference, you simply |
13 |
> correct it later on. It's not as if *you* incorrectly published the |
14 |
> software anew - you just tagged on the wrong license initially, and by |
15 |
> referring to the wrong license, you aren't somehow magically |
16 |
> relicensing the software. |
17 |
|
18 |
I think this makes the most sense, maybe because it requires the least |
19 |
amount of work. ;) |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
24 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
25 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |