Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: LICENSE and revbumps
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:59:38
Message-Id: 20080827195911.4c112182@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] LICENSE and revbumps by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:02:02 +0200
2 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:17:48 -0600
5 > Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > Should LICENSE changes require a revision bump?
8 >
9 > No.
10 >
11 > Any ebuild should be published with a correct reference to a license.
12 > If you initially publish the ebuild with a bad reference, you simply
13 > correct it later on. It's not as if *you* incorrectly published the
14 > software anew - you just tagged on the wrong license initially, and by
15 > referring to the wrong license, you aren't somehow magically
16 > relicensing the software.
17
18 I think this makes the most sense, maybe because it requires the least
19 amount of work. ;)
20
21
22 --
23 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
24 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
25 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature