1 |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. posted on Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:01:08 -0400 as |
4 |
> excerpted: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > This is more food for thought to start a discussion on new category |
7 |
> > names. With Wayland becoming more of a reality every day. I think some |
8 |
> > of the x11-* categories may need to change. Stuff in there may not be |
9 |
> > bound to X and can run on Wayland or X. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Examples x11-libs/gtk+ |
12 |
> > x11-terms/terminology |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Not sure what better "universal" category names would be. But seems it |
15 |
> > maybe time for a discussion on such and some new categories and package |
16 |
> > moves. Given thus stuff can run under X or Wayland. Not sure x11 makes |
17 |
> > sense anymore. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I can do this on my own in my own overlay. But likely best for official |
20 |
> > categories as this effects the tree not just others overlays etc. I do |
21 |
> > not really have any ideas for better names. Just seems like a need. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> That could be a lot of package-move churn. It arguably might make sense |
24 |
> to keep the current names "for legacy reasons". (Or not. Just |
25 |
> speculating here.) |
26 |
> |
27 |
> FWIW, there was some related discussion awhile back on USE=X, proposing |
28 |
> USE=gui instead, but I don't know what became of it. Perhaps gui-* |
29 |
> category names if that's actually moving forward, in ordered to maintain |
30 |
> a bit of consistency and for lack of a better idea? |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
I think "USE=X" should be reserved for X specific stuff. If it's being |
34 |
used to control gui in general IMHO that's not appropriate. It's bad on |
35 |
principle and is likely to cause practical difficulties later if confusion |
36 |
arises vs competing guis, like qt, gtk, wayland, etc. |
37 |
|
38 |
> |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
41 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
42 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
43 |
> |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |