| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, Jason Zaman wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:46:19AM +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 4 |
>> How should one report bugs ? to infra or portage ? |
| 5 |
>> From my just rsynced tree, I see changelogs in reverse order: oldest |
| 6 |
>> come first, latest come last |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> NOTABUG, it was changed because rsync can deal really well with |
| 9 |
> appending to the end of files. rsyncing a file where things were |
| 10 |
> things were added to the beginning of the file means rsync will copy |
| 11 |
> the whole file from scratch which is pretty sub-optimal. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Our ChangeLogs were always in newest-first order, so why would this |
| 14 |
suddenly be an issue? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Also readability for users should take priority over technical |
| 17 |
matters. Newest first is the usual order (e.g. it agrees with the |
| 18 |
default of git log), and ChangeLog having different order from |
| 19 |
ChangeLog-20* seems rather confusing to me. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ulrich |
Archives