| 1 |
How about someone decide which is the best version and keep it integrated |
| 2 |
in OpenRC? There's no best version? diff the two of them and merge what |
| 3 |
matters. I mean, how many distros do you know that have two sets of init |
| 4 |
scripts *just* to configure networking? I know Gentoo is about choice, but |
| 5 |
this feels a little too much choice. What will I choose next? Someone can |
| 6 |
decide that keymap needs a refactor and just fork it, of maybe hostname, |
| 7 |
or <insert_some_stupid_but_*needed*_init_script_here>. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Just my 2 cents... |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina < |
| 13 |
zerochaos@g.o> wrote: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 16 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 19 |
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 20 |
> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote |
| 21 |
> >> |
| 22 |
> >>> Considering our default configuration ships sshd (an argument we don't |
| 23 |
> >>> need to rehash here), it seems a bit silly to not ship networking |
| 24 |
> >>> support by default. I'd rather not do it as part of the system set, |
| 25 |
> >>> though that would be consistent with what we're doing with ssh, and it |
| 26 |
> >>> is still override-able. |
| 27 |
> >> To handle the various possible cases, maybe we need a "virtual/net" as |
| 28 |
> >> part of the system set, which can be satisfied by either oldnet or |
| 29 |
> >> newnet or whatever. The install ISO will have a basic working network |
| 30 |
> >> stack (IPV4+IPV6). After the initial install, the admin can do |
| 31 |
> >> whatever. Maybe even invoke package.provided. |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in OpenRC. |
| 34 |
> > I would probably call it virtual/network-manager though. |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind, you know, |
| 37 |
> net-misc/networkmanager. That's just too confusing imho. I wouldn't |
| 38 |
> object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything else that isn't |
| 39 |
> confusing. The net scripts are not a network manager, networkmanager, |
| 40 |
> wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be things I would consider to be network |
| 41 |
> managers. |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> - -Zero |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> > Are there any issues with putting together a virtual like this and |
| 46 |
> > adding it to @system? |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> > Thanks, |
| 49 |
> > |
| 50 |
> > William |
| 51 |
> > |
| 52 |
> |
| 53 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 54 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 55 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
| 56 |
> |
| 57 |
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJReGucAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKSZIP/23ZA8sFNnVSUsOQcZf/nBMh |
| 58 |
> ZJPH1eIOfalja64dJCXXlDb/0C0H5vkFBuuGJ+0ifVuulny6yDs0BV75w9x7Tecg |
| 59 |
> FsP2y2tSQQwCwqdV6GP7bab07BbTZ1DhnEpLajVYZexr9BAk8bsQki6vdkZ7n39b |
| 60 |
> 7iRhtiRz2mKsIK4jq+C6GG1C+QMdg1gycpij60//fJfFatgQ4CWNssMOA2j2lbr4 |
| 61 |
> gLjx9NovKJg+cenPHF8dyIuutQIcl7ehKBtYraqFYfx2QbNerkBHoeCupQ6tiuIa |
| 62 |
> bB2DXR9Ujb0OOB50KxrwFwdW61oJ7Z7bZbPCTQJp2F78eGp4hFcUUbcN6gB75zQE |
| 63 |
> l4ILJALegn8/mwVlP6veXZZoqOPi8ccvo0ZSQDHnQo3jyQM4kgkHnv3T8JavkjUk |
| 64 |
> njFEOUatGsss1Fal7r7Wk39ip9OamolEqdiHJZTqa96OoOzv1lFRp5fU9y6Vi96A |
| 65 |
> nAZ70JEpX2C3UMZ1LIImWE0LArzr+1F4qWH0fpakikRKBr2NSSTUyI7BQzc5YKwg |
| 66 |
> +cTuaPSGmRUIeZXofhJ6Ut5LtwlAqRcf3boCAOQvj8oqWbZy2Kkd+MuUoaZcl5VM |
| 67 |
> u5uXx4LpZfC+eeCalCfdK4DDUwhLk/mvyf4r9ZqlL0QAAg+tmKEvEHTn7Zz++Q2o |
| 68 |
> WAb5pvOnn5BYM+HdqPpr |
| 69 |
> =5kV9 |
| 70 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 71 |
> |
| 72 |
> |
Archives