| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 14/01/13 09:48 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:25:01AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: |
| 6 |
>> William Hubbs wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> I have a bug opened with the docs team and release engineering |
| 8 |
>>> to discuss whether we want the new names for new installs. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> IMO yes we do. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> What's that bug - or what is the good way to thumbs up/down? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=451950 |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The focus of this bug really is how to document the new names in |
| 17 |
> the handbook if they decide to go that way. The problem we will |
| 18 |
> have is we don't know the names of the interfaces a user will see. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That's easy enough to deal with -- list a code block that says what |
| 22 |
command to use to find out the iface names, and show an example of the |
| 23 |
output. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
For that matter, if udev-197 goes stable it'll be included on the |
| 26 |
livecd, right? So a user's interface on the livecd will already be |
| 27 |
set to the new naming scheme. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
***OH***, that'll mean the livecd's config (or at least the openrc |
| 30 |
oldnet portion) is going to need some work.... |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlD1Ww0ACgkQ2ugaI38ACPB/sAEAlr+wzX5X7jEsY2KkbC9hylu7 |
| 36 |
IAIyoZkbtl0A5Z+68A8BALXbRZyv+PZg1eqmWr0DNXfmdwVidOq0RISOxBt0sK7W |
| 37 |
=mTAM |
| 38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives