Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 12:06:57
Message-Id: 4FC75E3A.4000903@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Dirkjan Ochtman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/30/2012 04:31 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
5 > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson
6 > <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
7 >> No, the last mock conversion is still live and updating fairly
8 >> often:
9 >> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
10 >
11 >>
12 > Since you seem to know most about this project, can you give a
13 > short summary on what *you* think are hard blockers for the
14 > migration?
15 >
16 > Cheers,
17 >
18 > Dirkjan
19 >
20
21 The 6 hours it takes to clone the repo.
22
23 - - Aaron
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
26 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
27
28 iF4EAREIAAYFAk/HXjoACgkQVxOqA9G7/aB2DwD+JqdcMJDIfu30Oht8rB6H/pMY
29 Wr1RjhujZvVGIDQG55QA/jPlsWh3c8El7HjxzhjoCNIPkV1Vj3b7VZVc/D6y6oq9
30 =FxGY
31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies