| 1 |
2014-08-17 22:56 GMT+04:00 Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4 |
| 3 |
> and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to |
| 4 |
> hearing Qt team opinion. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I second this opinion (especially after porting a few libraries' |
| 7 |
ebuilds to multibuild to support qt5 builds). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I don't know, though, how (and whether it's possible) to automate |
| 10 |
sed'ing the library names in qmake/cmake/whatever build system, since |
| 11 |
you'll have to have different ones for qt4 and qt5 builds. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Georg Rudoy |
Archives