1 |
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:26:38 +0100 |
2 |
Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > Hi all, |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > In bug #304435[1], hwoarang suggested merging the devrel handbook[2] into |
8 |
> > the devmanual[3]. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > As the project has grown, so has the amount - and dispersion - of |
11 |
> > development information. I believe consolidation of this information into a |
12 |
> > single point will make everyone's (especially new developers) lives easier. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > What do you think? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Best regards, |
17 |
> > Michael |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=304435 |
20 |
> > [2]: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml |
21 |
> > [3]: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ |
22 |
> |
23 |
> +1 and btw move the devmanual in the wiki :D |
24 |
|
25 |
I'm not sure if wiki fits nicely here. I believe that wiki is very |
26 |
useful at taking notes, writing quick guides and sharing information |
27 |
and tips in general. The main advantage is the free workflow -- you |
28 |
have an idea to share but can't do it all by yourself. You start it, |
29 |
others can easily improve it. |
30 |
|
31 |
Sadly, our wiki is MediaWiki. Not getting deep into it, the syntax is |
32 |
worse than awful. It could be considered acceptable if you write |
33 |
encyclopedia articles, stuff with heavy inside linking and not much |
34 |
code inside. However, for technical articles it is horrible, horrible |
35 |
and once more horrible. |
36 |
|
37 |
Shortly saying, devmanual in wiki would mostly consist of HTML tagsoup |
38 |
intermixed with wiki text. For the very simple reason that MediaWiki |
39 |
lags markup for as basic things as inline code and requires you to use |
40 |
HTML instead. Not something I'd use for anything as fundamental |
41 |
as devmanual. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Best regards, |
45 |
Michał Górny |