Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Jackson <brian@××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.2.2 what the hell ...
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:19:23
Message-Id: 200302241817.13723.brian@mdrx.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.2.2 what the hell ... by Eric Noack
1 You should check bugzilla or the archives for this list
2
3 -OR-
4
5 I could be a nice guy and make it easy for you
6 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15025
7
8 HTH
9
10 --Brian Jackson
11
12 On Monday 24 February 2003 05:12 pm, Eric Noack wrote:
13 > hey cool
14 >
15 > i spotted gcc-3.2.2 being merged when updating today.
16 >
17 > AFTER being finnished python ( and such emerge) didnt work anymore as well
18 > as mod_php from apache, ... , ... , ...
19 >
20 > doe not finding libstdc++.so.5
21 >
22 > updatedb, ldconfig, ... did not help, but removing
23 > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.1 and linking
24 > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.2 to 3.2.1 did at least make it work
25 > again -- somehow
26 >
27 >
28 > this is a dirty workaround and im just waiting for the 1st segfaults, so
29 > what happened, any idea?
30 >
31 > i spotted the 3.2.2 ebuild updating many .so 's in the system not saying
32 > exactly what it was doing, updating lib dependencys? were some dirs just
33 > forgotten?
34 >
35 > the ebuild said something about gcc-config not found just before, but it
36 > scrolled away too fast to bring it back, so i dont have the exact syntax,
37 > so im just asking what could have happened here. (I guess downgrading to
38 > 3.2.1 would reverse it)
39 >
40 > i guess this is worth a bug report, but since it sounds serious im writing
41 > it to the -dev list to tell enough people.
42 >
43 >
44 > Eric
45 >
46 > --
47 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
48
49
50 --
51 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.2.2 what the hell ... Eric Noack <eric.noack@×××.de>