| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I don't think that solves the license problem properly. Say, if user |
| 4 |
> doesn't want non-free software, he's going to have the whole package |
| 5 |
> masked. He'd have to work-around license + savedconfig. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Now that I look at it, it seems that the ebuild doesn't even put all |
| 8 |
> necessary licenses into LICENSE. I may be wrong but the git repo seems |
| 9 |
> to have a lot of non-standard licenses. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, it is a mess and it changes often. You can find an attempt to |
| 12 |
disentangle it in bug 318841. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Ulrich |
Archives