| 1 |
On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:59:09 -0400 |
| 3 |
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Policy says to go with upstream's naming. This is, after all, why we |
| 5 |
> > > have categories. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Sure, and along those lines upstream seems to call it ant_menu or |
| 8 |
> > ant_menu.vim :) |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=155 |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Not for the versions in the tree they don't. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
You mean 0.5.3 released 2003-12-28. IMHO that borderlines a stale |
| 15 |
package or one that should be punted. Or at min bumped since there has |
| 16 |
been two releases since then. With the latest one being 0.5.5 |
| 17 |
2006-11-19. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
So is that app really used? Does anyone care about? Sure looks like not |
| 20 |
in both cases. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 24 |
Gentoo/Java |
Archives