1 |
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
2 |
<wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is debate |
5 |
> on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug request and |
6 |
> makes it invalid. Despite the need still existing, and PMS lacking |
7 |
> anything on sets. |
8 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624300 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Just the needs I have with portage are stalled, marked as invalid. No |
11 |
> discussion for inclusion in PMS. Like documenting sets. |
12 |
|
13 |
Ah, well, that's the main mystery of this thread solved. Thanks. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
Rich |