Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 22:20:34
Message-Id: CAGfcS_n7jDaV-Ab=JK1DOuLO2vu4P0_yC4qa6iQA-NZAs-2SfA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
2 <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 > Portage supports sets, but the PMS has no mention. Then there is debate
5 > on what they are. Creating so much noise it drowns the bug request and
6 > makes it invalid. Despite the need still existing, and PMS lacking
7 > anything on sets.
8 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624300
9 >
10 > Just the needs I have with portage are stalled, marked as invalid. No
11 > discussion for inclusion in PMS. Like documenting sets.
12
13 Ah, well, that's the main mystery of this thread solved. Thanks.
14
15 --
16 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>