1 |
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 19:33 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> now that the issue with depclean is resolved (the reason we removed USE=acl in |
3 |
> the first place), users shouldnt be able to [as easily] break their systems |
4 |
> |
5 |
> so if we're going to be enabling cruft like USE=ldap by default, we should be |
6 |
> adding back in acl |
7 |
|
8 |
I would prefer that we add this into a new release profile and move it |
9 |
"up" the profile inheritance tree as the non-acl profiles get |
10 |
deprecated, rather than introduce this into the current profiles. In |
11 |
fact, for anything that isn't a required change, we really should be |
12 |
doing things more like this simply to ensure that we aren't changing |
13 |
things out from user people. That being said, if others disagree, I |
14 |
don't really have a solid argument against it other than preferring |
15 |
things stay more static in the profiles, where possible, so I wouldn't |
16 |
object to it. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Chris Gianelloni |
20 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
21 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
22 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
23 |
Gentoo Foundation |