| 1 |
On Jul 22, 2004, at 5:34 am, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> does anyone have a reason for why supersed *shouldnt* be removed from |
| 4 |
> the |
| 5 |
> tree ? afaik, sed-4.x pretty much incorporated most of the 'cool' |
| 6 |
> things |
| 7 |
> supersed does and at this point, it seems pretty useless |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
There's been mention of `sed` on Gentoo-osx in the last few days. |
| 10 |
<http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gentoo-osx&w=2&r=1&s=sed&q=b>. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It seems that GNU `sed` syntax is widely used in the Portage tree, yet |
| 13 |
Mac OS is supplied with a BSD version of `sed`. I don't really know |
| 14 |
what the implications are, or whether this might be a justification for |
| 15 |
keeping `supersed` about, but thought I might bring it to your |
| 16 |
attention. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Stroller. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives