| 1 |
Hello, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Sorry I'm answering posts from quite a while ago. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Bruce A. Locke wrote: [Sat Sep 22 2001, 04:12:41AM EST] |
| 6 |
> Does the new mozilla-bin package have all the headers, libraries, etc |
| 7 |
> needed by third party programs like galeon? If so should we set up |
| 8 |
> a PROVIDE so people can choose weither they feel like compiling |
| 9 |
> mozilla or using the mozilla.org provided binaries? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I *believe* that it contains everything necessary, however I'm not sure. |
| 12 |
I added it as a stop-gap measure because I couldn't get Mozilla to work |
| 13 |
when compiled from source. I was unaware at the time that it had to be |
| 14 |
run once as root before it could be run as a normal user. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Hallski wrote: [Sat Sep 22 2001, 05:15:08AM EST] |
| 17 |
> I've asked agriffis to look into this. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Since I'm now using the mozilla (source) ebuilds, I'm not planning to |
| 20 |
look into the question. If somebody using the mozilla-bin ebuild would |
| 21 |
like to look into it, feel free. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Morgan Christiansson wrote: [Sat Sep 22 2001, 12:24:49PM EST] |
| 24 |
> Why doesn't someone just build a gentoo .tbz2 package of it? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
An interesting thing about the mozilla-bin ebuild is that it doesn't |
| 27 |
require Gtk+ or any of the other supporting libraries, since it includes |
| 28 |
them. Otherwise I agree with you. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Aron |
Archives