From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input? |
Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:22:09 |
Message-Id: | 18887.18094.328906.70609@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de |
1 | Now that "dosed" is going to be banned, what would people think of |
2 | "newins" (and the other "new*" commands) accepting "-" as the first |
3 | argument? I don't know how many usage cases there are, but the |
4 | following are obvious: |
5 | |
6 | sed 's/quux/quuux/' foo | newins - foo |
7 | |
8 | It would allow for here documents: |
9 | |
10 | newins - bar <<-EOF |
11 | # configuration file (for example) |
12 | EOF |
13 | |
14 | or even: |
15 | |
16 | newins - baz <<<$'# a short\n# file' |
17 | |
18 | Ulrich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input? | "Tiziano Müller" <dev-zero@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input? | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newins "-" for standard input? | Timothy Redaelli <drizzt@g.o> |