1 |
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:45:40 -0500 |
2 |
Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I was attempting to be helpful and filter out valid packages from the |
5 |
> list. I could have been an ass and been like "Yo I think |
6 |
> package.mask is bloated go clean it" and not given a list at all, but |
7 |
> that is not very useful. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I never said ( or meant for ) everything in that list to be cleaned, |
10 |
> and perhaps I should have added a "use your own descretion" deal. |
11 |
> The goal was to have a list that someone can quickly glance over and |
12 |
> be like "hmm I maintain one or two of those lets check it out". |
13 |
|
14 |
Sorry for hitting you with this, just that this is I thinkt he third |
15 |
call for "cleaning package.mask" in the last 10 months or so, always |
16 |
claiming that a mask that doesn't cover any ebuilds in the tree is |
17 |
invalid (and everytime people write their own scripts for it). |
18 |
One would think there might be more important things to do. |
19 |
|
20 |
Marius |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
24 |
|
25 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
26 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |