| 1 |
hmmz.. portage 1.9.2 should be masked then imho |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:28:25AM -0500, Fuper wrote: |
| 5 |
>> On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 04:48, Gila wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > Hi there.. i having a problem merging the new portage version. |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > root@Gitop portage # emerge portage |
| 9 |
>> > Calculating dependencies \ |
| 10 |
>> > !!! Error: couldn't find match for dev-python/python-fchksum in |
| 11 |
>> > sys-apps/portage-1.9.2 |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> same here. The emerge fails. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Ah, me too :-/ |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> The fun part is that a portage-1.9.2.ebuild fetched today |
| 19 |
> has the python-fchksum dependency, but python-fchksum is masked (as of |
| 20 |
> two hours ago). Strangely, a portage-1.9.2 I rsynched yesterday (two |
| 21 |
> days ago) doesn't have this dependency, builds and works fine. (So I |
| 22 |
> copied it to the affected machine and was back in business). I guess |
| 23 |
> we just have to wait a bit more till the latest round of problems (I |
| 24 |
> mean the one that started with circular dependency hell, python 2.2.-6 |
| 25 |
> and portage 1.9.3) sorts itself out. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> No emerge rsyncs for me in the next few days ... |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Stefan |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 32 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 33 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 34 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives