| 1 |
Matt Rickard wrote: |
| 2 |
> Portage currently does not contain any vanilla prerelease kernels (i.e. |
| 3 |
> 2.4.22_pre7). Bug 25107 is a request for this, and it seems reasonable |
| 4 |
> to have these kernels in portage, since we have pretty much every other |
| 5 |
> kernel branch you could think of in there :) |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Yes. Absolutely right. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I'm wondering what's the best way to handle these? First option is to |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
How about splitting development-sources into 2.6.x and 2.4.x trees? |
| 12 |
It's not like 2.6.x is the only branch undergoing 'development'. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
As to how to split this I'll leave up to you. Adding a suffix to it to |
| 15 |
give rise to two categories may be an idea. Just some thoughts. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
With regards. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives