Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jason Wever <weeve@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:11:11
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.62.0504290809530.580@stargazer.weeve.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft by Jason Stubbs
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jason Stubbs wrote:
5
6 > The initialization time of portage is directly related to the number of
7 > packages installed. Cutting out excess ebuilds from the tree won't speed this
8 > up at all. Cutting out excess ebuilds won't have much effect on the general
9 > running of emerge at all, actually, except for updating the cache after
10 > syncing.
11
12 Does that include the about >=10 second delay when emerge is first run on
13 a box after a reboot before you get any visible output on the screen, or
14 is that an entirely different problem?
15
16 - --
17 Jason Wever
18 Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iD8DBQFCckCCdKvgdVioq28RAlJ6AJ0bf2NHAFr6Otc7v0HvbyqOlb7DDgCfYrTR
23 6tFh38nSUwVw6XDXvYnWmxk=
24 =ODsL
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft Elfyn McBratney <beu@g.o>