| 1 |
On 25/02/13 23:21, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> My point was just that: |
| 3 |
> 1. No, the fact that entire packages fail to build/operate using |
| 4 |
> -ffast-math is not a valid bug. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
From your email the message was the opposite, maybe a not got lost? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> 2. If individual packages DO carefully use -ffast-math and that |
| 9 |
> breaks, it might be a valid bug, and may or may not be a blocker |
| 10 |
> depending on real-world impact. That doesn't mean users sticking it |
| 11 |
> in their CFLAGS - it means the ebuild or upstream build system |
| 12 |
> carefully applied the flag appropriately. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That means that if the upstream cflags do not work (anymore?) with |
| 15 |
certain compilers we should notify them. Seems sensible to do. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
lu |
Archives