Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 05:32:05
Message-Id: f4d9b3dc948f69281d08fdff2866846429aef8e3.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. by Sam James
1 On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 03:38 +0000, Sam James wrote:
2 >
3 > ACL is kind of similar to what Ionen said for PAM, i.e. sometimes
4 > people may want to turn it off and it makes sense to expose
5 > this option for those who do, but we don't need to try support it.
6 >
7
8 This is another important one. It has security implications, is highly
9 confusing, requires kernel support, and is nonstandard as a USE flag
10 and as an implementation. Most people should have it off to avoid
11 surprises, but disabling it in the kernel can make the userland
12 software complain when explicitly built with ACL support.

Replies