| 1 |
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:53:07AM +0800, Mike Gardiner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Dylan, Ciaran, all |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Apologies for entering this late, but from what I gather from the |
| 5 |
> discussion, there seems to be the notion of voting for "real" bugs |
| 6 |
> versus "enhancement" bugs, with some believing votes for the second |
| 7 |
> would outweigh the first, and skew the perception of what really needs |
| 8 |
> to be done. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> So I guess my question follows, is it possible/feasible to only allow |
| 11 |
> voting on bugs marked as "enhancements"? (as in the bugzilla keyword). |
| 12 |
I don't think this would do any good. Users tend to mark bugs as |
| 13 |
enhancement on a whim, from what I've seen. I'd say we should enable |
| 14 |
voting for all bugs, and users should be informed that all enhancements |
| 15 |
are considered separately from problems (your "real" bugs), and it |
| 16 |
should be possible to show the highest voted problems as such. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm also strongly in favour of a limited number of votes per user. Along |
| 19 |
the lines of 2 votes/week for non-developers, and 4 votes/week for |
| 20 |
developers. Unused votes should NOT get carried over between weeks, to |
| 21 |
prevent vote hoarding. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 25 |
E-Mail : robbat2@××××××××××××××.net |
| 26 |
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2 |
| 27 |
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639 |
| 28 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives