| 1 |
On 07/06/16 10:19 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/06/16 05:19 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 06/06/2016 04:53 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> This -can- be simplified using a REQUIRED_USE to force just-one-of |
| 6 |
>>> gtk3,qt4,qt5 , but you can technically do the same with USE=gui too -- |
| 7 |
>>> all you'd need to do is add dependencies for the no-specific-flag case. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> RDEPEND="... |
| 10 |
>>> qt5? ( dev-qt/qtcore:5 ) |
| 11 |
>>> qt4? ( dev-qt/qtcore:4 ) |
| 12 |
>>> gtk3? ( x11-libs/gtk+:3 ) |
| 13 |
>>> gui? ( !qt5? ( !qt4? ( !gtk3? ( dev-qt/qtcore:5 ) ) )" |
| 14 |
>> Wow, that is wonderfully horrible, and making me a little bit angry ... |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> So USE="-qt5 gui" enables qt5 in this scenario. How is that reasonable? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> (And as usual I'm now at the stage where I am not sure what problem that |
| 20 |
>> we had before we are actually solving ...) |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> I didn't like that particular version either, (A) because of what you |
| 24 |
> said, and (B) due to it needing a REQUIRED_USE to enforce a |
| 25 |
> just-one-of dependency. But people don't *LIKE* to have layered |
| 26 |
> use-flag logic, so... |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
s/know/like/ on last sentence |
Archives