| 1 |
Michael Orlitzky posted on Sun, 04 Aug 2013 18:30:33 -0400 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 08/04/2013 06:20 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:15:35PM +0000, Duncan wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Michael Orlitzky posted on Sun, 04 Aug 2013 18:01:40 -0400 as |
| 6 |
>>> excerpted: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>>> Since it was pulled out of openrc, the name "netrc" also suggests |
| 9 |
>>>> itself. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> I like it, if it's not taken elsewhere and will thus cause problems. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Maybe, but then when it is ported to other init systems (someone was |
| 14 |
>> even talking about adding functionality so it would work under systemd) |
| 15 |
>> a name that ties it to OpenRc doesn't make sense. |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> It's not tied to openrc, any more than e.g. openvpn is tied to badvpn. |
| 18 |
> That's what they are, network rc scripts. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Exactly. That's why I like it. netrc is generic enough to be used |
| 21 |
elsewhere, yet descriptive enough of what it actually does, that from my |
| 22 |
perspective anyway, it's perfect. =:^) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 26 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 27 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives