| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:14:57PM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 26/04/13 02:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 07:27:06PM +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher |
| 7 |
> > Nguyễn wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> William Hubbs schrieb: |
| 9 |
> >>> if we keep a dependency for a while, even behind something |
| 10 |
> >>> like IUSE="+oldnet", when we drop it, people will still be hit |
| 11 |
> >>> if they do emerge --depclean before they emerge gentoo-oldnet. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> In my opinion USE flags should toggle dependencies only in |
| 14 |
> >> metapackages or rare exceptions. I suggest to include |
| 15 |
> >> gentoo-oldnet (or whatever name you choose for it) in the @system |
| 16 |
> >> set once it is stable, and until then be a hard dependency of |
| 17 |
> >> OpenRC. |
| 18 |
> > Please note that openrc itself is NOT in the @system set. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > sys-apps/baselayout is, and has PDEPEND on openrc. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Are we all OK with putting the new package in PDEPEND in baselayout |
| 24 |
> alongside the openrc dep, then? Seems that would suffice, plus would |
| 25 |
> allow users that really don't want it to package.provides it away .... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
No, because the goal is o remove the pdepend from baselayout eventually |
| 28 |
[1]. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
William |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409385 |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> iF4EAREIAAYFAlF6xCAACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAX6AD/WBhfhw/jV0UjyyjCgsDStHw1 |
| 39 |
> WPPRJfMpICU+wT3j8J0BAKOEU+3pWXDif9jBS8X4IA2Ccyq2q9vUAxwQS4WXdgdA |
| 40 |
> =8KK6 |
| 41 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
> |
Archives