Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:52:23
Message-Id: 4E380EEA.6080505@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On 08/02/2011 10:31 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:28:58 -0400
3 > "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote:
4 >> I prefer capsetting in the PMS itself, with a nice clean function
5 >> which auto detects all the necessary conditions and transparently
6 >> preserves caps, as you suggest. Maybe this can be in EAPI=5.
7 > Would need a spec, along with a way of dealing with all the problems:
8 > what happens if the build fs supports caps but the install fs doesn't?
9 > What about if caps are supported on both but in different ways (tmpfs
10 > on some kernels)? Is it up to the PM to deal with that? How does the PM
11 > even know?
12 >
13
14 That's exactly what I was thinking of for the PM. It would have to
15 autodetect all that. Eg. it could create a test file on each fs and
16 then do a getcap on it and if it fails, you have your answer. If
17 necessary and it exists, it could look at /proc/config. I think it's
18 doable.
19
20 >> I'm also wondering if, in the mean time, it might be worth writing a
21 >> bash script and/or howto on converting as many binaries as possible
22 >> from setuid to caps --- hitting up all the usual suspects. Its not
23 >> ideal but might still be useful until we get this squarely in the PMS.
24 > PMS currently explicitly states that caps might get clobbered on a
25 > merge (because Portage does that sometimes). So if you're doing it now,
26 > it'd have to be as a pkg_postinst thing. But I'd strongly recommend not
27 > going that route, since it'll almost certainly go horribly wrong in a
28 > "your system randomly no longer works" kind of way... Better to ban
29 > things from using caps for now.
30 >
31
32 I was thinking something even dirtier, something outside of the PMS
33 altogether, along the lines of what one does when converting to a
34 selinux system where one relabels the entire filesystem with rlpkg. So
35 no, not something via pkg_postinst().
36
37 --
38 Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
39 Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
40 E-Mail : blueness@g.o
41 GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
42 GnuPG ID : D0455535

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] POSIX capability in Gentoo "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>