Archives
Archives
| From: | Alistair Bush <ali_bush@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reworking package stabilization policies | ||
| Date: | Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:31:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201003281931.10274.ali_bush@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reworking package stabilization policies by Maciej Mrozowski |
||
| 1 | > On Saturday 27 of March 2010 21:58:41 William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some random |
| 4 | > php/perl library that's known to work. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Have you ever just considered closing the stabilization bug and ignoring the |
| 7 | arch. If they take so long to mark your packages as stable why do you care |
| 8 | about them enough to even attempt to stabilize anything on their arch. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reworking package stabilization policies | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reworking package stabilization policies | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |