Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:04:35
Message-Id: 20060403230136.GA1434@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct by Mike Frysinger
1 On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:38:48PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/xml/conduct.html
3
4 > If you choose the latter option, please ensure members of the
5 > Infrastructure project have reviewed and approved the proxy
6 > relationship to avoid having access cut off for both developers.
7
8 In other words, if suspended dev A notices something's broken, and
9 dev B (not suspended) agrees, dev B is required to leave it broken until
10 infra makes a decision. I assume that's not the intent, so could that
11 sentence please be reworded or dropped?
12 --
13 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>