1 |
On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:37 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 |
> I think project leads could apply for exception from the council if they |
3 |
> are more like on going maintenance (arch teams come to mind). But |
4 |
> something like Java has had something big in works all the time I have |
5 |
> been involved. I don't really care about the implementation that much as |
6 |
> long as we have a page where all the current major things under work are |
7 |
> described. |
8 |
|
9 |
I think the projects doing major things is the exception, rather than |
10 |
the rule. That being said, there's nothing stopping you (or anyone) |
11 |
from doing a page like this now, without needing to extend the |
12 |
projectxml, at all. All someone needs to do is create it. After all, |
13 |
why should we: |
14 |
|
15 |
- extend the xml |
16 |
- have everyone edit their own project pages |
17 |
- create some parser that has to troll all of the project pages to |
18 |
create a single page |
19 |
- maintain said parser |
20 |
|
21 |
when we could simply have a single page for everybody to edit with the |
22 |
given information? |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Chris Gianelloni |
26 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
27 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
28 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
29 |
Gentoo Foundation |