| 1 |
Am Samstag, 17. Januar 2015, 01:56:01 schrieb Patrick Lauer: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 16 January 2015 18:29:08 hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Patrick Lauer: |
| 4 |
> > > On 01/16/15 23:26, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
> > >> Patrick Lauer (patrick): |
| 6 |
> > >>> patrick 15/01/16 04:16:55 |
| 7 |
> > >>> |
| 8 |
> > >>> Modified: ChangeLog |
| 9 |
> > >>> Added: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild |
| 10 |
> > >>> Log: |
| 11 |
> > >>> Bump |
| 12 |
> > >> |
| 13 |
> > >> I expect people to ask me for review if they bump any of my packages. |
| 14 |
> > >> That includes QA team members. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > Are you always in such a bad mood? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Do you, as QA team member, think that a review workflow improves quality? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> No. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Bureaucracy does not improve quality by itself. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Oh for ${DEITY}'s sake, get a soundproof basement somewhere and fight it out. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Yes we have that rule about "touching other developer's ebuilds", and it also |
| 27 |
applies to >10year devs. So since the maintainer insists, how about "ok, I'm |
| 28 |
sorry, will do better next time"? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
I see absolutely no need to invoke any QA privileges here, and it also wasn't |
| 31 |
done when doing the bump. So the only QA team "involvment" would be that it's |
| 32 |
expected of members of privileged teams to be sensitive about doing things by |
| 33 |
the book. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 37 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) |
| 38 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 39 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives