Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:35:53 | ||
| Message-Id: | ertkab$54i$1@sea.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? by Andrej Kacian |
||
| 1 | Andrej Kacian wrote: |
| 2 | > It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1. Themes should |
| 3 | > go last, along with gtk1 itself. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Gtk1 is already ugly enough, do you want it to be even more ugly? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Point, set, and match. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | by design, by neglect |
| 11 | dirtyepic gentoo org for a fact or just for effect |
| 12 | 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree? | Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@g.o> |