1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> Vim 7 includes a native spellchecker. It uses its own spell file |
3 |
> format which can be created using Myspell *.aff/*.dic files (the same |
4 |
> as for Mozilla and OpenOffice). The spell files are rather large, so |
5 |
> it's not feasible to bundle them with vim unconditionally. |
6 |
|
7 |
are them interchangeable? |
8 |
|
9 |
> |
10 |
> Building a spell file from source is tricky and requires huge amounts |
11 |
> of RAM and some fairly obscure dependencies. Upstream ship pre-built |
12 |
> spell files, and I believe it would make most sense for us to use |
13 |
> those. |
14 |
|
15 |
I second that. |
16 |
|
17 |
> |
18 |
> Note that spell files have to be generated for each internal character |
19 |
> set that may be used. This generally means utf-8 (used by gtk2/qt gvim |
20 |
> internally no matter what) and the appropriate iso-8859- code for the |
21 |
> country in question. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
That should cover most uses. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
> Questions: |
28 |
> |
29 |
> * app-vim or app-dicts for the spell files? |
30 |
|
31 |
app-dicts if they can be non vim only... |
32 |
|
33 |
> |
34 |
> * Will there be sufficient interest from other developers to make this |
35 |
> worthwhile? |
36 |
|
37 |
if is vim only I'm not sure. |
38 |
|
39 |
> |
40 |
> * Is anyone going to get upset about the character set decisions? |
41 |
> |
42 |
|
43 |
As usual I'm afraid... |
44 |
|
45 |
> * Does anyone think we should make users build spell lists from source, |
46 |
> even though it can require several GBytes of RAM? |
47 |
|
48 |
Only if requested by user (think about an useflag) |
49 |
|
50 |
lu |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
|
54 |
Luca Barbato |
55 |
|
56 |
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader |
57 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
58 |
|
59 |
-- |
60 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |