Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for an alternative portage tree sync method | ||
| Date: | Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:45:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | 42401375.5000003@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Proposal for an alternative portage tree sync method by Ricardo Correia |
||
| 1 | Ricardo Correia wrote: |
| 2 | > Hi, |
| 3 | > Please read the following proposal, I think you'll be interested: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-2218914.html |
| 6 | |
| 7 | So on every sync, you have to download the entire 260mb ISO file? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I don't think our mirrors would be very happy about that. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Daniel |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for an alternative portage tree sync method | Paul Waring <pwaring@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for an alternative portage tree sync method | Francesco Riosa <francesco@×××××××××.it> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for an alternative portage tree sync method | Ricardo Correia <gentoo-dev@××××.org> |