Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:07:14
Message-Id: 20090527210642.6b7b0f21@snowcone
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 by Roy Bamford
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Wed, 27 May 2009 20:55:33 +0100
5 Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote:
6 > That means the EAPI needs to be extracted before the ebuild is
7 > sourced, which from the figures bandied about on the list may take
8 > marginaly longer but its a price worth paying for a sound system
9 > design. Gentoo should not repeat the VHS vs Betamax war. For those
10 > who do not remember, VHS was the better marketed but inferior
11 > technical solution that won the standards war for domestic Video
12 > recorders.
13 >
14 > The aims of GLEP 55 are good but the proposed implementaion is bad
15 > practice, so GLEP 55 should be rejected in its present form.
16
17 You have not made a single technical argument in your entire message.
18 Please don't add yet more noise to the discussion.
19
20 - --
21 Ciaran McCreesh
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
24
25 iEYEARECAAYFAkodnVkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGerACcC2khWKdGKCaMTi7zE/jYyUUw
26 bU8AnA5Gg6bDz/JiDIwMB98R5t9dQNLg
27 =bfse
28 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for May 28 Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>