| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> So the still unanswered question appears to be, would we like Gentoo |
| 5 |
> to have fewer packages and less choice but greater QA, stability and |
| 6 |
> a feel of professionalism, or would we like to have more packages and |
| 7 |
> choice but a worse QA record, make some mistakes, and have a more |
| 8 |
> community-based feel? If you're going to try to answer this question |
| 9 |
> please be delicate with your repsonses, in the past I can recall |
| 10 |
> developers leaving over exactly this divide... |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Sometimes we have bugs and packages that have some official |
| 13 |
maintainer, but he never reacts...do we want that? Sometimes I clear |
| 14 |
some old bugs assigned to some, that are trivial to fix; seldomly I get |
| 15 |
a reaction from that person (negatively or positively). |
| 16 |
I have no problem with a trigger for undertakers so they can go and |
| 17 |
check if the person committing only a bit takes care of his bugs... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
V-Li |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project |
| 23 |
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/> |
Archives