Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: profiles/updates/ 'move' lacks support for versioned syntax (was: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:18:07
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43666vhnmuAkQRF2SZ92xYaPPPJUwa3=7_c1jrxyVfa_g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: profiles/updates/ 'move' lacks support for versioned syntax (was: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo) by Samuli Suominen
1 On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 04/23/2012 03:28 PM, Duncan wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Samuli Suominen posted on Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:22:53 +0300 as excerpted:
5 >>
6 >>> Title: The default JPEG implementation
7 >>
8 >>
9 >> [...]
10 >>
11 >>> All users are recommended to migrate:
12 >>>
13 >>> # emerge -C media-libs/jpeg:0
14 >>> # emerge -1 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo
15 >
16 >>
17 >>
18 >> There's no way to use portage's automatic block-resolving ability here to
19 >> avoid that, I take it?
20 >
21 >
22 > Too bad profiles/updates/ doesn't support versioned syntax[1] like,
23 >
24 > 'move =media-libs/jpeg-8* media-libs/libjpeg-turbo'
25 >
26
27 I don't think a package move is appropriate here anyway. That would
28 just move the files in vdb without actually building/installing
29 libjpeg-turbo.