| 1 |
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 23:44, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:32:07AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I noticed that we are distributing proprietary software in our stage3 |
| 4 |
> > (namely, the blackdown jdk). I can't think of a reason to do this, |
| 5 |
> > and it seems to contradict our "social contract" if its a dependency |
| 6 |
> > of the software we're distributing. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Matt |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I believe catalyst fixes this. Daniel will have more information. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Its inclusion was unintentional. The new db-4 had an optional java? USE |
| 13 |
which was causing blackdown to get pulled in to the stage3 (since the |
| 14 |
java USE is enabled in GRP building.) Catalyst fixes this (makes sure |
| 15 |
only a base set of USE vars are enabled when stage3 is built,) resulting |
| 16 |
in a stage3 that is a lot smaller and no blackdown. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Regards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Daniel |
Archives