Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: kuzetsa <kuzetsa@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: That's all folks. (Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists)
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 19:54:21
Message-Id: 27d1dd74-424f-7729-5543-c2c625c69152@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: That's all folks. (Re: OT Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists) by "Michał Górny"
1 On 12/10/2017 03:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3 > Your attack on me is fully unfounded and completely inappropriate. FYI,
4 > just let me correct a few facts here:
5 --- pruned ---
6 > 3. The agenda item wasn't expressing 'feelings of one developer', as you
7 > know it. It was written by me because I found the time to prepare
8 > a rationale of *facts* to support it. Don't shoot the messenger.
9
10 Yes.
11
12 I'm a fan of transparency, but there are many people
13 with passionate views, so sometimes it's harder to
14 have a calm discussion about social matters.
15
16 If / when these discussions happen, remarks about
17 various actions by specific people tends to escalate
18 hostility. On the other hand, generalizations about
19 how gentoo-related communication should occur isn't
20 a "shots fired" or "touchy subject" situation.
21
22 TL;DR - Public fighting doesn't help gentoo.
23
24 -kuzetsa
25
26 P.S. I'm trying to stay out of these contentious topics.
27 Also, your composure / tone seems fine to me, mgorny.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature