Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:44:20
Message-Id: 48B440F6.7020705@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition) by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Duncan wrote:
5 > I therefore believe I like just moving them all to a *virtual*/ category
6 > better, thus obviating the need for that particular property in the first
7 > place.
8
9 This has been suggested elsewhere in the thread [1] but I think the
10 the PROPERTIES approach will be more flexible and practical for the
11 reasons that I've already stated.
12
13 [1]
14 http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_65636255c9d284e51898e826cae09ffd.xml
15
16 - --
17 Thanks,
18 Zac
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
21
22 iEYEARECAAYFAki0QPEACgkQ/ejvha5XGaPtJgCdFTpDzQfSo6zARHSje8b+h7I7
23 OAAAnjzo8SdYaeZ7Cmqnj+5xUSHlU7i+
24 =Gj7B
25 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies