| 1 |
Michael Hammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o> [081112 00:46]: |
| 3 |
>> What are others feelings on this? |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I like the idea! |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> What issues do you see with having a wiki? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a |
| 12 |
>> wiki? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> We should develop some kind of review process and at least the |
| 15 |
> possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases |
| 16 |
> the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed |
| 17 |
> section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the |
| 18 |
> infos provided have a minimum of quality. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> g, mueli |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Regards, |
| 26 |
Petteri |
Archives