| 1 |
On 07/03/14 21:57, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> [ ... ] |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> So, make sure only 50-udev-default.rules has it's rfkill line and create |
| 5 |
> file 70-gentoo-acl.rules with content of: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="udev-acl" |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This would make it work with ACLs "+" if user is viewed as 'active = TRUE' in `ck-list-sessions` |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Can someone confirm? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
I don't get why 99-systemd.rules uses SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill" but someone |
| 16 |
just posted me this: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
$ udevadm info -a --name /dev/rfkill |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
looking at device '/devices/virtual/misc/rfkill': |
| 21 |
KERNEL=="rfkill" |
| 22 |
SUBSYSTEM=="misc" |
| 23 |
DRIVER=="" |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
So it would have to be KERNEL=="rfkill" instead of SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill"? |
| 26 |
Would be so much easier if I had a device that created /dev/rfkill, I |
| 27 |
wonder if that can be simulated somehow sane. |
Archives