| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> Don't forget the "... and make a reasonable commitment for a |
| 3 |
> substantial period of time". In other words, not ATs, who are ATs |
| 4 |
> because they lack the experience or commitment to be fully fledged |
| 5 |
> developers. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Far easier to withdraw the GLEP and just ask for anon cvs access for |
| 8 |
> people who need it... |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
<respectfully> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I wholeheartedly disagree. The fact that I am an AT with aspirations |
| 14 |
towards becoming a full dev does not in any way imply that all ATs fill |
| 15 |
the same mindset. I see the AT position as a wonderful opportunity to |
| 16 |
give something back to Gentoo without the added responsibility (or |
| 17 |
hassle) that comes along with being a full dev. I get the feeling from |
| 18 |
talking to several of the other ATs that some may not wish to become |
| 19 |
devs -- does that mean that their contribution (direct contribution) |
| 20 |
should not be recognized? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Scott. |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives