| 1 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> posted |
| 2 |
200802011705.18653.vapier@g.o, excerpted below, on Fri, 01 Feb |
| 3 |
2008 17:05:18 -0500: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> On Friday 01 February 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 6 |
>> Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: |
| 7 |
>> > base/packages: |
| 8 |
>> > removed debianutils |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> I don't think we reached a decision on whether debianutils should go to |
| 11 |
>> kernel-2.eclass before this is done. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> i think the answer is no |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Not that I have a vote, but as I raised that possible objection earlier, |
| 16 |
agreed. Folks who have it already merged will be fine unless they |
| 17 |
--depclean without first checking what it'll do, and those that don't |
| 18 |
have it merged can merge it if they need it -- it's not as if it's |
| 19 |
leaving the tree, and the kernel doesn't hard-depend on it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
A GWN or similar announcement before it moves beyond the dev profiles |
| 22 |
would be nice, but if the affected devs (incl. bugwranglers) are willing |
| 23 |
to deal with the complaints and they seem to be, the leaner system and |
| 24 |
image is IMO a good thing, and announcement or not, people really |
| 25 |
/should/ be checking their depcleans. =8^) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 29 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 30 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives